3 ms·

I wouldn't be too sure on the second point. I recently went through a background verification check initiated by one of the FAANG company. It was all clear for

I wouldn't be too sure on the second point. I recently went through a background verification check initiated by one of the FAANG company. It was all clear for me but the criminal check report kind of hinted the sources they were hitting up. It seems they were looking up: - Media reports - Court records(they had called the search global, I am not sure if that's just a namesake or if they are hitting up systems of even multiple countries) Additionally, there was identification number of human verifiers on the reports.

cheez 6y ago
Yep, same, though not in CA. I had a record but no convictions. It didn't prevent me from getting the job but they did try to use it as a negotiating tactic to lower salary (didn't happen, I also forced them to increase it by 10% at the 3 month mark)
- oblongx 6y ago
  I really curious what was their tact with that? "We see based on your record that you're not worth as much as we thought..."
  - sq_ 6y ago
    Real reason: "oh, look, we might be able to spend less for this person's work" Tactic: "well, we'd be taking a risk by hiring you, what if you do something bad again? or if this turns in to a PR problem?"
    - freepor 6y ago
      If they refused to hire you I’d be fine with it, but lowballing 10% means they’re not seriously concerned about the risk.
      - cheez 6y ago
        They didn't low ball 10%, it was more like 25%.
        freepor 6y ago
        If you are an insurance company and you raise someone's rates 25% it's just business -- risk management in large pools. As a hiring decision, though, any percentage discount makes it clear that you're not seriously worried about the risk -- if you were, you just wouldn't hire the person. On the individual hiring decision the risk calculus doesn't work like that -- "they're a greater risk so they'll need to provide more of a profit compared to their salary."
    - cheez 6y ago
      That was almost verbatim lol
  - cheez 6y ago
    I loved my boss. He was openly himself and the circumstance was one such that any money he didn't pay me went to his pocket. I understood this and had absolutely no hard feelings towards him and his honesty was one reason why I continue to respect him and vice versa. So he tried many times to find reason to pay me less than I wanted, this was one.
- koolba 6y ago
  That’s sounds like an epically dick move. Was it localized to the hiring department trying to “win” a negotiation or systemic to the company?
  - cheez 6y ago
    Just the boss negotiating with me. No hard feelings about it.

cheez 6y ago

Yep, same, though not in CA. I had a record but no convictions. It didn't prevent me from getting the job but they did try to use it as a negotiating tactic to lower salary (didn't happen, I also forced them to increase it by 10% at the 3 month mark)

oblongx 6y ago
I really curious what was their tact with that? "We see based on your record that you're not worth as much as we thought..."
- sq_ 6y ago
  Real reason: "oh, look, we might be able to spend less for this person's work" Tactic: "well, we'd be taking a risk by hiring you, what if you do something bad again? or if this turns in to a PR problem?"
  - freepor 6y ago
    If they refused to hire you I’d be fine with it, but lowballing 10% means they’re not seriously concerned about the risk.
    - cheez 6y ago
      They didn't low ball 10%, it was more like 25%.
      - freepor 6y ago
        If you are an insurance company and you raise someone's rates 25% it's just business -- risk management in large pools. As a hiring decision, though, any percentage discount makes it clear that you're not seriously worried about the risk -- if you were, you just wouldn't hire the person. On the individual hiring decision the risk calculus doesn't work like that -- "they're a greater risk so they'll need to provide more of a profit compared to their salary."
  - cheez 6y ago
    That was almost verbatim lol
- cheez 6y ago
  I loved my boss. He was openly himself and the circumstance was one such that any money he didn't pay me went to his pocket. I understood this and had absolutely no hard feelings towards him and his honesty was one reason why I continue to respect him and vice versa. So he tried many times to find reason to pay me less than I wanted, this was one.
koolba 6y ago
That’s sounds like an epically dick move. Was it localized to the hiring department trying to “win” a negotiation or systemic to the company?
- cheez 6y ago
  Just the boss negotiating with me. No hard feelings about it.