3 ms·
I mean NNs are still quite bad at low n tabular data (and they may always be), which is honestly how a lot of real life data is, so there is clearly a need for
by stu2b50 6y ago
I mean NNs are still quite bad at low n tabular data (and they may always be), which is honestly how a lot of real life data is, so there is clearly a need for not a neural network.
I feel like I've seem more tree ensembles in the wild than SVMs, though.
- rangerranvir 6y agoAnyway the idea of NNs was introduced to work on data which a simple human brain couldn't make sense of. For more general tabular data, like trees, regression and even rule based models are more realistic.