4 ms·
Indeed, to the "cool" and also "show a need". I'm currently looking for the "need". Take for example, Flick, Picasa and similar. At first it doesn't seem a use
by zemanel 16y ago
Indeed, to the "cool" and also "show a need". I'm currently looking for the "need".
Take for example, Flick, Picasa and similar. At first it doesn't seem a use case because there are already dozens of online, offline and hybrid applications to manage those collections. But when you add "web interoperability" to it, as in, copy/pasting/moving from into/out of those and into other webapps (copying some pictures from Flick into Posterous, directly) it starts to sound a lot more exciting and worth exploring, which is where i'm at at the moment.
- jf 16y agoMy "need" for something like this would be so I could have an effortless way to keep backups of all of my social network data. In fact, ideally this product would be integrated into Dropbox, since that's already part of my backup "strategy". I would pay money for this. In fact, I'd be willing to pay money now, up front, for a proof-of-concept.