3 ms·
“Industrial Society and Its Future”, Ted Kacynzski (the Unabomber) https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm https:/
by ryeights 6y ago
“Industrial Society and Its Future”, Ted Kacynzski (the Unabomber)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unab...
While the man and his actions were reprehensible, his manifesto was lucid and insightful and, in my opinion, correctly diagnoses many of modern society's ails.
>In modern industrial society only minimal effort is necessary to satisfy one’s physical needs. It is enough to go through a training program to acquire some petty technical skill, then come to work on time and exert the very modest effort needed to hold a job. [...] Thus it is not surprising that modern society is full of surrogate activities. These include scientific work, athletic achievement, humanitarian work, artistic and literary creation, climbing the corporate ladder, acquisition of money and material goods far beyond the point at which they cease to give any additional physical satisfaction [...]
>For many if not most people, surrogate activities are less satisfying than the pursuit of real goals (that is, goals that people would want to attain even if their need for the power process were already fulfilled). One indication of this is the fact that, in many or most cases, people who are deeply involved in surrogate activities are never satisfied, never at rest. Thus the money-maker constantly strives for more and more wealth. The scientist no sooner solves one problem than he moves on to the next. The long-distance runner drives himself to run always farther and faster. Many people who pursue surrogate activities will say that they get far more fulfillment from these activities than they do from the “mundane” business of satisfying their biological needs, but that is because in our society the effort needed to satisfy the biological needs has been reduced to triviality. More importantly, in our society people do not satisfy their biological needs autonomously but by functioning as parts of an immense social machine. In contrast, people generally have a great deal of autonomy in pursuing their surrogate activities.
- slx26 6y agopdf without limitations: http://editions-hache.com/essais/pdf/kaczynski2.pdf http://editions-hache.com/essais/pdf/kaczynski2.pdf > 61. [...] There may be disagreement about whether the effort needed to hold a job is “minimal”; but usually, in lower- to middle-level jobs, whatever effort is required is merely that of OBEDIENCE. You sit or stand where you are told to sit or stand and do what you are told to do in the way you are told to do it. It's a very readable and interesting essay indeed. Sadly it seems it criticizes too much both left and right wings for people to recommend it in certain circles, or avoid it altogether saying the guy was a terrorist, with yet another example of the noncentral fallacy.
- EmptyAbyss 6y agoTo me these sound more like complaining that modern activities do not satisfy ancient human instincts well (mixed with legitimate criticism of paperclip-optimizing). Humanity is making something new with its whole way of life, figuring it out as it goes, so of course the old things don't fit, and we can't yet change them. Ted did go off to live in the woods, the ancient natural environment, so I shouldn't be surprised.