I wonder if it becomes an EEO issue (in the US). They can't compel a vulnerable WFH person to rejoin an open plan sardine office, nor can they fire them for no

I wonder if it becomes an EEO issue (in the US). They can't compel a vulnerable WFH person to rejoin an open plan sardine office, nor can they fire them for not rejoining without attracting attention for discrimination. I know a tech worker who used to wheel an oxygen tank to the office: I imagine that person is more than a little concerned right now. It also implies that a partly WFH workforce cannot be sidelined: once one person is remote the whole culture needs to be organized around remote process.