2 ms·
> or are so close to it that to pull up might cause an accident Well there is your loophole big enough to drive a truck (lorry?) through even on an amber light
by foobarian 7y ago
> or are so close to it that to pull up might cause an accident
Well there is your loophole big enough to drive a truck (lorry?) through even on an amber light!
- bennyelv 7y agoExcept if you observe a junction for a short while you'll see that in general people drive through even if there is no chance it would cause an accident. /devils advocate The loophole for a cyclist is that they could swing their leg off the bike and magically become a pedestrian, cross the stop line, get back on, and legally ride away across the junction regardless of lights. Given that swinging your leg off the bike makes no reasonable difference to anything, why get annoyed if they don't bother with that part? Isn't it just like claiming a general exemption on all amber lights because doing anything might cause an accident?