3 ms·
We evaluated Jitsi after discovering it during Zoom's security and privacy issues and have been incredibly surprised. The best part was that none of our more t
by socceroos 6y ago
We evaluated Jitsi after discovering it during Zoom's security and privacy issues and have been incredibly surprised.
The best part was that none of our more technically challenged members got stuck with joining a meeting (unlike Zoom). I'd say in terms of usability, it's better.
- Matticus_Rex 6y agoJitsi has come a long way in the last six to nine months, though. People who tried it even relatively recently would likely be surprised today (I was). It'll take some time for people to find out how good it has become (assuming it stays that good -- I never take that for granted with things I use for free anymore).
- the_mitsuhiko 6y agoDoes not match my experience at all. Jitsi has an awful UI and performance. Noise cancelling seems completely missing, people can’t figure out when they are muted or not (because of the UI) and if you have 20 people on the CPU goes berserk. In my experience at least and from people I share the calls with, Jitsi is the worst of the bunch but people use it because of privacy reasons.
- fock 6y agowould you mind explaining what kind of screen you are using/meeting you are in, where 20 people need to/can see and speak to each other within a split-second?
- Jonnax 6y agoIf a product can't do something, whilst it's competition can without issue. Then it's not really a case of going "but do you really need it?"
- socceroos 6y agoNot sure about noise cancellation as we never had an issue, but what you describe about ~20 participants and muting intuitiveness doesn't match our experiences with a wildly tech-illiterate audience.