4 ms·
An even simpler solution that I have seen implemented on some open field crossings is to deliberately block the view line somewhere close. It doesn't have to be
by usrusr 7y ago
An even simpler solution that I have seen implemented on some open field crossings is to deliberately block the view line somewhere close. It doesn't have to be blocked on the entire approach, just enough to ruin the illusion of having sufficiently observed the entire crossing road. It could be a billboard with traffic safety propaganda (or ads), some greenery or a stack of photovoltaics. Not much bigger than a bus usually.
- gpderetta 7y agothis solution is actually discussed in the article and dismissed because it would be very visually intrusive with the rest of the forested land and because careless drivers might still only give a quick glance after not seeing any cars while approaching the junction from far away.
- FeepingCreature 7y agoRight, they presume that the entire approach would have to be covered. But the parent asserts that a short fence would be enough. (I'm inclined to agree.)
- petercooper 7y agoI'd agree with that. Even something to "break up" the view and add ambiguity might make people stop... the road equivalent of a scarecrow, perhaps.. some "scarebikes"? :- (I've seen a lot of cardboard cutouts of police officers at various petrol stations in recent years. They do make you think twice when you see them out of the corner of your eye.)
- ehnto 7y agoSame principle for tight city streets being safer than wider open city streets. It makes the limits of your perception more obvious and (hopefully) puts you on alert and engaged in the driving. It doesn't actually make it any more challenging to drive, it's just making the reality of the situation more clear.