4 ms·

I think that most people find this hard to digest. The committee approves a ton of emojis with a dozen variations each, a gazillion characters that make it poss

I think that most people find this hard to digest. The committee approves a ton of emojis with a dozen variations each, a gazillion characters that make it possible to make some weird word soup that breaks sane layout, but including one of the most commonly used symbols is somehow out of the question.

DagAgren 6y ago
Because all of those symbols are used as part of text, while the external link symbol isn't. It is not part of the text itself. If you copied that text, you would not really expect the link symbol to be copied along with it.
- nabla9 6y ago
  >If you copied that text, you would not really expect the link symbol to be copied along with it. Because it's not in Unicode it can't be copied. If it was in unicode symbol I would expect it.
  - DagAgren 6y ago
    But it's not part of the text, it is a decoration. Even if it was in Unicode, I would not expect it to be part of the copied text.
    - pas 6y ago
      Isn't this something like a stylistic editorial decision? Basically it could be either way depending on what the author/publisher/editor wants. On a lot of pages links are hidden as plain text and only show up if someone hovers over them. (Great? Confusing? Bad UX? Sure, but still a choice.) At the same time someone else might just use underlining, but no different color. And someone might just want to use a symbol.