> An argument can be made that physically addictive substances violate a person's agency. Are the substances immediately addictive? Should we violate the agenc

> An argument can be made that physically addictive substances violate a person's agency. Are the substances immediately addictive? Should we violate the agency of those unaffected? What if people consent to having their agency violated? Make no mistake, I'm not defending tobacco companies, I'm against the notion of my body's inputs being subject to someone else's control.