3 ms·
Better still with an electric motor you have more options for motor placement. You don't have a big fat engine that has to be placed in the front[1]. The batte
by spitfire 6y ago
Better still with an electric motor you have more options for motor placement. You don't have a big fat engine that has to be placed in the front[1]. The batteries don't have to sit in the wings, they can theoretically sit at the bottom of the plane making weight easier to manage.
You also get more options for blade types. Like ducted fans.
In short, your plane doesn't have to be designed around a fat gasoline engine and tanks. There's still constraints, but you get much more creative freedom.
I expect when we see planes designed around the motor/batteries we'll see aerodynamics get electric planes into GA territory.
EDIT: aerodynamic efficiencies.
[1] Yes there's that tractor/pusher Cessna, no one liked it.
- sokoloff 6y agoIn a lot of ways, you prefer the battery weight to be in the wings. The main one is that it reduces the load on the critical wing-fuselage junction (the source of zero-fuel-weight limitations in larger aircraft).
- spitfire 6y agoBut now you have that choice. You can package things however you want, even in weird shapes. Not "has to allow liquid to flow downhill, even in rate 2 turn". I'll bet there's still wins to be found even with putting batteries in wings.