4 ms·
I couldn't agree more. The biggest problem with CoffeeScript adoption is the administrative overhead required for novices to get it running. This means that mo
by JoelSutherland 16y ago
I couldn't agree more.
The biggest problem with CoffeeScript adoption is the administrative overhead required for novices to get it running. This means that most CoffeeScript projects are usually larger -- it just doesn't get used in small one-off things.
My company's product is a hosted CMS and we just tackled this problem (http://www.gethifi.com/blog/hosted-cms-coffeescript-support http://www.gethifi.com/blog/hosted-cms-coffeescript-support) by completely eliminating the workflow issue. You can use Coffee or JS and the system takes care of the rest for you.
I've found this to be a big help when working on smaller client sites. Often I just need to write a couple dozens lines of JS and it just isn't worth the hassle to do it in Coffee -- now it's gravy.
- munificent 16y agoI started toying with CoffeeScript a while back for my own entertainment and found the administrative overhead was much less than I anticipated. I went from a clean slate to being up and running in like five minutes. Once I had node and CoffeeScript installed, it was just a single command-line to start a watch on my .coffee file and then I was back to "refresh browser window to see my changes" mode just like regular JS.