It is difficult to see what your actual criticism is here. Do you object to the tone that people take when criticizing anti-vaccine arguments? Or do you object

It is difficult to see what your actual criticism is here. Do you object to the tone that people take when criticizing anti-vaccine arguments? Or do you object to the faith that people have in the overall utility of biomedicine? I agree that there is faith there. All it takes to renew faith in the effectiveness of peer review (for instance) is to purposefully spout some half-baked naive nonsense at a well-trained scientist and listen to their honest rebuttal without getting defensive. Science is hundreds of thousands of people doing that, all at once. Maybe the problem is that so many people don’t know any scientists to do that with?