Yeah, this is a hard no from me. It also provides me with little confidence that the data itself is particularly useful, since the terms basically prevent anyo

Yeah, this is a hard no from me. It also provides me with little confidence that the data itself is particularly useful, since the terms basically prevent anyone from publicly doing any kind of cross-validation. Scientific peer review didn't appear as some sort of bureaucratic oversight, it appeared because people value information that other experts have reviewed and said "Yeah, that checks out." By even trying to prevent people from doing that, I think the value of this data set is drastically reduced.