4 ms·
To tie this closer to what we do: I often think of another NYT article in a similar vein, where they profiled people in the Bay Area whose net worth was in the
by evmar 6y ago
To tie this closer to what we do:
I often think of another NYT article in a similar vein, where they profiled people in the Bay Area whose net worth was in the ~$10m range.
This is an enormous amount of money and you'd think nobody would stick at a job they didn't like once they were at this point. As I recall in the article, the people in this situation kept thinking "I just need a little bit more" to enable some important next step on the luxury ladder, like horse lessons for their children.
I found this chilling especially because as a person who is wealthy but not that wealthy (note that if you make $40k/yr you're in the top 1% of humans already) I could see myself making similar sorts of rationalizations, not about luxury specifically but more around whether I have enough.
I encountered this attitude a lot in the Bay Area for the ~15 years I lived there and it was one of the reasons I recently left -- I worried my son would grow up around it and think that it was somehow normal behavior.
- draw_down 6y agoI definitely don’t understand anybody who is working towards a goal other than not having to work a job anymore. Being free to spend your time in the way you deem best, free to help those around you in whatever way you see fit sounds pretty nice to me. But freedom can also be terrifying, especially if you don’t know what you want.
- askafriend 6y ago> note that if you make $40k/yr you're in the top 1% of humans already Ok but $40k/yr in Mississippi or Africa is markedly different from $40k/yr in a place like the Bay Area...