You make the assumption that: - the ones who wrote/edit wikipedia articles for random companies aren't the the Marketing/PR departments of such companies; - M

You make the assumption that: - the ones who wrote/edit wikipedia articles for random companies aren't the the Marketing/PR departments of such companies; - Marketing and management feel that simple language devaluates the company importance; When in reality, any company should keep an eye on their wikipedia page - if not them, then who the hell has the best knowledge to update it. Sucessfull companies have pretty straightforward and simple communication, that's why they pay specialists to do it, or do it in house with specialists of their own. Unless you're talking about a random company where the marketing is done by someone who had to fill for the marketing guy that left the week before, because he said in a lunch break that he had graphic design course in colege. If that's the case, then why bring it up as a generalization, since is a bad practice, and indeed the exception to the rule? Or the goal is to state the obvious: there are bad marketers/managers like there are bad developers/artists/electricians/MDs/nurses and any other profession done by people.