3 ms·
"Here in SoCal purchasing a home with a traditional 20% down would involve locking up $200,000 that could be put into the market productively" I've been saying
by jerf 7y ago
"Here in SoCal purchasing a home with a traditional 20% down would involve locking up $200,000 that could be put into the market productively"
I've been saying this for years, maybe after this year it'll make more sense: It is not sensible to model "the market" as if it makes steady X% (for X somewhere in the 5-8 range) returns every year. It can and has gone decades being flat-ish, or slightly down after inflation, or up but nowhere near X% a year. The timescale where this is a reasonable model is longer than your expected productive working years. "Return X% a year" is basically the best case on a decade time scale, not the average case. There have been time frames in my life when paying principle on my mortgage was a significantly better "investment" than the stock market.
In hindsight it'll be obvious what you should have done, but in hindsight you can turn a few hundred dollars into a few million in just a couple of weeks with perfect past knowledge of the market, so if we're stipulating hindsight you've made way bigger mistakes than merely "buying a house".
- ashtonkem 7y agoIn the long run, the market beats principle in your home. But “the long run” can often be far beyond a useful timeframe for a single human lifespan.