4 ms·
Provide data that shows it is a larger risk. Without that data you are arguing based on ideology not facts. The thing about not working is that we have governm
by take_a_breath 6y ago
Provide data that shows it is a larger risk. Without that data you are arguing based on ideology not facts.
The thing about not working is that we have government mechanisms to help those people. We can beef up social security, unemployment benefits, or direct payments. Then people can go back to work afterwards. Work will always exist. It exists even now with a “closed” economy.
The thing about dying is that it’s pretty final.
- matz1 6y ago>We can beef up social security, unemployment benefits, or direct payments If you give people money for not working, who are going to work then ? Money will become meaningless if you can't use to buy stuff.
- take_a_breath 6y ago==Money will become meaningless if you can't use to buy stuff.== I don't follow this line of thought. We already give people money for not working (examples are social security and unemployment benefits). None of that has made money obsolete. Why would a temporary measure in the midst of a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic? Why don't I see people make this same argument about businesses getting money from the government? Will money become meaningless for businesses? Do people stop trying to earn money once they reach a certain level? Elon Musk certainly hasn't.
- matz1 6y agoOk tell me then, let say the government give people money for not working then why would people then want to work on let say grocery store where you suggest its risky ?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]