3 ms·
I'm not entirely sure what you expected from 'infection rate', it is the terminology being used every where to signify the number of infections. If you wanted
by Abishek_Muthian 7y ago
I'm not entirely sure what you expected from 'infection rate', it is the terminology being used every where to signify the number of infections.
If you wanted to know, 'how many people does a single person spread the infection' i.e. R0 or R-Naught; then it has come down to 1.55 on 11th April from 1.83 on 6th April[6].
[6] https://theprint.in/science/r0-data-shows-indias-coronavirus-infection-rate-has-slowed-gives-lockdown-a-thumbs-up/399734/ https://theprint.in/science/r0-data-shows-indias-coronavirus...
- legolas2412 7y agoYou can't say infection rate and not say a percentage. What the article says is the number of infections, not a rate. And I'm not talking about the effective reproduction number.