The law is going to have to catch up here. Jay-Z has worked very hard to make his 'voice fingerprint' have value. Having listened to the deepfake, it's an ext

The law is going to have to catch up here. Jay-Z has worked very hard to make his 'voice fingerprint' have value. Having listened to the deepfake, it's an extremely accurate copy of Jay-Z's voice. To what degree does Jay-Z's voice constitute a 'work of art' and to what degree does a copy become a forgery? You could say that an impression made by a real person is a 'work of art' but if you remove a real person and use ML, is it still a 'work of art'? We really need to consider the existential questions raised by primitive forms of AI and consider what AGI means from a philosophical perspective before lawyers and judges start defining what can be done with AI in society.