3 ms·
True! The way microcomputers supplanted mainframes. If you launch cheaper satellites more often: - you get to iterate so you can make improvements at a much fa
by Gravityloss 7y ago
True! The way microcomputers supplanted mainframes.
If you launch cheaper satellites more often:
- you get to iterate so you can make improvements at a much faster pace
- there is less problems from a single failure
- more scale effects
You can enter a virtuous cycle.
There are limits! It can be that it's hard to make a useful satellite once you go below some certain size. And reliability suffers if you try to skimp on good practices.
On many scientific satellites, the instruments are one off anyway and are complex, hard and hand built with astronomical costs, so it might not save so much even if the launch and the bus were a lot cheaper.
- rbanffy 7y agoI understand the analogy, but this one is bad. Microcomputers came about because, at some point, we could make small computers with just enough processing power that they could be useful. Mainframes didn't really go anywhere - they are still doing heavy lifting in large corporations, and modern mainframes employ every trick we use to make x86's fast and then a couple that would make x86's prohibitively expensive.