3 ms·
> If the 1988 supreme court wouldn't protect the reputation of a national religious leader, they aren't going to do so for politicians today. Well that gave me
by curiousgal 7y ago
> If the 1988 supreme court wouldn't protect the reputation of a national religious leader, they aren't going to do so for politicians today.
Well that gave me a good chuckle! The fact that a supreme judge is appointed by the sitting president and confirmed by the Senate means that they can push whatever dogma the ruling party has.