2 ms·
> Youtube cannot have it both ways. Either they are a publisher and if so, must be fully responsible for the content they host. Or they are a platform, and they
by akersten 6y ago
> Youtube cannot have it both ways. Either they are a publisher and if so, must be fully responsible for the content they host. Or they are a platform, and they need to be neutral.
As demonstrated by the court case you mention, that is false. I am surprised how tightly people cling to this notion, which has no basis in reality.
- foolinaround 6y agocan you please be clearer? What is false? Do you think youtube is a platform? even, a monopoly of sorts?
- pw201 6y agoThe publisher/platform distinction that you think exists in US law does not. The CDA does not say what you think it does. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/04/no-section-230-does-not-require-platforms-be-neutral https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/04/no-section-230-does-no...