4 ms·
So that's the positive, but you completely ignored the negative. I know you did it on purpose, but I don't know why. The kids who were already statistically bo
by Loughla 7y ago
So that's the positive, but you completely ignored the negative. I know you did it on purpose, but I don't know why.
The kids who were already statistically bound for a positive outcome due to family and income are fine, and locking that in even tighter. The kids who have hurdles have EVEN HIGHER hurdles now.
- GrayTextIsTruth 7y agowhy do people need to be consumed by the negative all the time? must everybody be an activist? what do you realistically expect people to do besides talk about it online? is this really the place to virtue signal?