4 ms·

Is this due to people being unable to afford it, or telecoms being unwilling to build infrastructure?

• davidw 7y ago
  It's in the middle of a huge city. If nothing else, they could use mobile data hotspots. The school district has been handing those out to kids with no stable internet at home where I live in Oregon, or trying to, at least.
  • adamsea 7y ago
    Oregon !== South Central
  • drchopchop 7y ago
    Not everyone has laptops, and the school may not have the resources to provide devices. Zoom is one thing, but doing any serious learning on a phone is difficult - and that's assume the parent is OK with letting the child use theirs for a large part of the day.
    • davidw 7y ago
      Yes, you would have to ensure that everyone has a device of some kind.
  • asdff 7y ago
    4G is not very reliable in LA.
• danans 7y ago
  The most valuable and scarce resource for many parents right now is time. Even parents who theoretically have "time" due to a recent layoff or furlough are under stress of trying to apply for various benefits while paying the bills somehow, so the task of organizing their kids' home academic schedule is just daunting, leaving aside the issues of lack of internet access or computers. It was challenging for me and my spouse, despite both having jobs that switch to WFH and flexible schedules, plenty of computers, and internet access.
  • _bxg1 7y ago
    I think you replied to the wrong comment. I was asking about home internet availability.
    • danans 7y ago
      Internet availability is an issue, as is device availability. Even poor families who have a computer may only have 1 for the whole family.
• cbhl 7y ago
  My impression is that it's a mix -- telecoms only want to upgrade wireline infrastructure where it's profitable (so, more affluent areas), and in my experience, in SF, there is some degree of NIMBYism about internet infrastructure at the street level ("green boxes" and the like) so even if the telecom is willing it can be hard to get consensus from the neighbors.
  • Torwald 7y ago
    > telecoms only want to upgrade wireline infrastructure where it's profitable true > (so, more affluent areas) no. criteria is population density, that's what makes it profitable.
    • egypturnash 7y ago
      Hahahahaha dream on, I’m in the middle of a pretty dense part of a city, but not a rich part, and I have exactly one internet option and it is ass.
      • selimthegrim 7y ago
        Ray Nagin got released yesterday and I get cold sweats in bed thinking if Cox hires him back to unleash some new fresh hell
• mobilefriendly 7y ago
  The US has an obsolete, anti-competitive regulatory regime. In many states, the system allows local governments to grant effective monopolies each to a cable video and telephone provider. So many communities have, at best, two internet providers, and cable video service is far from universal. So a lot of places only have DSL over copper phone lines and that's rarely at broadband speeds. In my community the monopoly phone provider is bankrupt and has not repaired lines, meaning not even DSL is available to some homes.