3 ms·
Just one person, but I didn't find this "very misleading". On first read of the title I assumed it was allowing senators to vote on senate votes remotely. Neith
by smeyer 6y ago
Just one person, but I didn't find this "very misleading". On first read of the title I assumed it was allowing senators to vote on senate votes remotely. Neither the current title nor your proposed title is the original I currently see on the article and I could imagine the title being improved, but I think it's unfair to characterize it as "very misleading".
- happytoexplain 6y agoI don't really think it's unfair. It's obviously not "very misleading" on purpose, but it's a little silly to look at the title "Senators Introduce Resolution to Allow Remote Voting" during a time when there is a lot of worry and argument about the ability of citizens to vote remotely and not assume most people will think they're talking about citizen votes. Hell, even if it weren't a currently relevant topic, I'm confident most people would still assume "voting" refers to the thing people do at the ballot boxes. That's just the default meaning of the word when the topic is US politics.