5 ms·

How come noone is considering these to be man made phenomena? I.E projections designed to look like solid objects? I saw this phenomenon with my own eyes in the

by egfx 6y ago

How come noone is considering these to be man made phenomena? I.E projections designed to look like solid objects? I saw this phenomenon with my own eyes in the 90’s and it’s very real but space aliens over made made projections? And before this projection idea gets debunked by the fact that this was caught on radar. Recent advancements have enabled the detection of projections via radar. https://books.google.com/books?id=AZoSALzL3V4C https://books.google.com/books?id=AZoSALzL3V4C I talked to someone who has a relative that flys high altitude spy planes about this and he said, “I’ll put it this way. There is nothing flying in the air that we don’t fully understand”.

dtx1 6y ago
Gimbal and Gofast lack enough info to not be explained by a baloon or a far away jet confusing the camera operators (i doubt the gimbal explanation due to context but again we lack the data...) As for the projection idea, that would explain the ability to reach impossible speeds. However as long as this is not demonstrated by anyone your guess is as good as the alien probe guess > I talked to someone who has a relative that flys high altitude spy planes and he said, “I’ll put it this way. There is nothing flying in the air that we don’t fully understand”. You see why this might be considered annecdotal at best?
s5300 6y ago
Ahh... yes. Your somebody's relative's anecdotal proof has definitely put this case to rest. I suggest nobody prose any further questions. Do we know if this person even has a relative? Maybe they have schizophrenia and it's a relative in their head. My anecdotal idea is that it's probably against some fairly serious oath that those who fly "high altitude spy planes" don't disclose that work to anybody... even relatives... Who knows tho, right?
koheripbal 6y ago
The consensus within the nuclear proliferation community (at least the community or researchers at the Arms Control Wonk slack channel) believe these to be a test of guided MRVs after a re-entry test. It seems pretty plausible. The hyper-speed, flying in formation, and the shape of the objects - all seem to be plausible for guided re-entry vehicles for a MRV nuclear missile test.

by egfx 6y ago

dtx1 6y ago

Gimbal and Gofast lack enough info to not be explained by a baloon or a far away jet confusing the camera operators (i doubt the gimbal explanation due to context but again we lack the data...) As for the projection idea, that would explain the ability to reach impossible speeds. However as long as this is not demonstrated by anyone your guess is as good as the alien probe guess > I talked to someone who has a relative that flys high altitude spy planes and he said, “I’ll put it this way. There is nothing flying in the air that we don’t fully understand”. You see why this might be considered annecdotal at best?

s5300 6y ago

Ahh... yes. Your somebody's relative's anecdotal proof has definitely put this case to rest. I suggest nobody prose any further questions. Do we know if this person even has a relative? Maybe they have schizophrenia and it's a relative in their head. My anecdotal idea is that it's probably against some fairly serious oath that those who fly "high altitude spy planes" don't disclose that work to anybody... even relatives... Who knows tho, right?

koheripbal 6y ago

The consensus within the nuclear proliferation community (at least the community or researchers at the Arms Control Wonk slack channel) believe these to be a test of guided MRVs after a re-entry test. It seems pretty plausible. The hyper-speed, flying in formation, and the shape of the objects - all seem to be plausible for guided re-entry vehicles for a MRV nuclear missile test.