2 ms·
And frankly I don't know what you're talking about with that "global cooling doom" nonsense Welcome to the internets, an exciting place for you to learn. http
by mynameishere 18y ago
And frankly I don't know what you're talking about with that "global cooling doom" nonsense
Welcome to the internets, an exciting place for you to learn.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling
The data quickly contradicted the global cooling predictions, as will happen again--perhaps. Of course, such contradictions are never a problem for people with an overriding political purpose. Instead of one crisis, they are happy enough to take the opposite crisis. Whether they have to switch again anytime soon is to be seen. Global temperature trends are sometimes quick and sometimes long.
http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2008/02/11/a-2000-year-global-temperature-record/ http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2008/02/11/a-200...
http://www.worldclimatereport.com/wp-images/loehle_fig3.JPG http://www.worldclimatereport.com/wp-images/loehle_fig3.JPG
99.999 percent of temperature swings occurred before the industrial age. Occam's razor again suggests that we should not blow trillions (yes, trillions) of dollars on anti-production boondoggles.
- Retric 18y agoThis hypothesis never had significant scientific support from your link. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling
- Prrometheus 18y ago>This hypothesis never had significant scientific support But sadly it still got a front page scare article in "Time"