37 ms·
> if you're not asked for a password do you know that you're unauthorized? I imagine that depends. If your bank allows you access to another person's account b
by MaxBarraclough 7y ago
> if you're not asked for a password do you know that you're unauthorized?
I imagine that depends. If your bank allows you access to another person's account by manipulating the URL, that presumably counts as a crime.
(Incidentally, this exact vulnerability has happened in the real world. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2656837 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2656837 , https://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/14/citigroup_website_hack_simple/ https://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/14/citigroup_website_h... )
- jlgaddis 7y ago> ... manipulating the URL, that presumably counts as a crime. "Manipulating the URL" -- "?id=1", "?id=2", "?id=3", in effect -- was enough to get Andrew Auernheimer (a.k.a. "weev") convicted and sentenced to ~3.5 years in prison [0]. Yes, his conviction was later vacated -- albeit due to a "technicality" ("improper venue"). Regardless, he still spent more than two years locked up for what really does seem like some completely exaggerated bullshit! > "... [the Third Circuit judges] were skeptical of the original conviction, noting that no circumvention of passwords had occurred and that only publicly accessible information was obtained." --- (Note: I've never met the guy, nor would I ever want to. Everything I've heard and read indicates that he's a pretty shitty human being -- and I suspect that didn't help him very much at trial. He almost certainly was deserving of some "bad karma" but that's not for the "justice system" to dish out.) TL;DR: If you're in the U.S., you might want to think long and hard before taking that chance! --- [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weev#AT&T_data_breach https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weev#AT&T_data_breach