I'm having a hard time making out what your comment says in response to mine. > As if anyone is arguing this. The comment I replied to literally argues this i

I'm having a hard time making out what your comment says in response to mine. > As if anyone is arguing this. The comment I replied to literally argues this in its single declarative sentence. > yes, a 25 year olds life is more valuable than an elderly persons You literally just argued it. > Your comments mark you as one of the people politicizing this. As if small business owners who have seen the data change and question why liquor stores can be open and they can't are all right wingers. If you don't think declaring old people to be sacrificial is political I don't think you are living in a world that understands what politics is. If you think a policy based on criteria that results in denial of care to most black people, who are at a disadvantage in the "years of health" calculation, while providing care to the majority of whites isn't political, what is? > The right wingers deny science on climate change. Now I'm seeing left wingers deny science on covid19 antibodies. (They already do it with nuclear power) > I've seen 5 antibody studies all say the same thing, and the left wingers just attack all of them reflexively. Sweden was right. We were wrong. This is definitely non-sequitor, and moves toward just ranting. It doesn't add to the conversation.