4 ms·
Oh no doubt - it still takes experience and technique to achieve a good effect with those tools, and of course they can't be used in all situations so other tec
by leejo 6y ago
Oh no doubt - it still takes experience and technique to achieve a good effect with those tools, and of course they can't be used in all situations so other techniques are required; but it still seems to me that "out of the box" the software is applying HDR like techniques when it isn't needed, or it would look a bit better if every part of the exposure wasn't normalised so much.
It seems that the software is doing a negative film photographer's trick of "expose for the shadows and the highlights will take care of themself" but rather it's "expose for the shadows and the HDR will take care of the highlights" - ending up in this overprocessed looking fake sky effect.
It's like there can't be any ambiguity anymore in a photo due to the exposure, the shadows and the highlights can't clip, we have to see everything. That seems a big change in mindset to me.
- janekm 6y agoI've been giving this some more thought and I think in many ways the photos from modern smartphones are more similar to paintings than what we are used to from photography. They try to create a visual representation of what our visual cortex would perceive the scene to look like. A painting of a room with a window would typically show both the room and the scene from the window "perfectly exposed", like the iPhone is doing with your skies. This looks very strange to someone used to images from more traditional cameras, and the artefacts like halos stand out.