3 ms·
I had the same thought, having first viewed it on Desktop (FF 75). On mobile it's much smoother (Oneplus 7T Pro), however, it doesn't come close to how in awe
by alias_neo 7y ago
I had the same thought, having first viewed it on Desktop (FF 75).
On mobile it's much smoother (Oneplus 7T Pro), however, it doesn't come close to how in awe I was at the smoothness of the Mavic Mini mini-site on mobile: https://www.dji.com/uk/mavic-mini https://www.dji.com/uk/mavic-mini
- the_pwner224 7y agoThe site stutters a lot for me on Firefox on my 1+ 7 Pro. I had a hard time trying to read the text in the middle of the first scroll section because it also seems to override the scroll to have tons of acceleration & low friction - which does not combo well with stuttery input. Meanwhile Apple's scrolling pages work great.
- rtkwe 7y agoThe Mavic site is doing something different than the the Airpod and Pixel Buds pages. The Mavic looks like it's triggering the animations once they're on screen. The two other sites are tying those animations directly to the scroll position, on both the Google and Apple sites the videos and animations will play backwards when you scroll back up. The closest the Mavic site comes looks like some of the static images replay if you scroll back up and down.
- alias_neo 7y agoThat makes sense. I could "feel" that they're implemented differently, but as a non-web developer I couldn't tell what the difference was. I just recall being really impressed with how the Mavic site looked/felt on mobile when it was first posted here some months ago.