5 ms·

Testing it out, it seems to be a dialog that accepts .fla files and tells you it can't convert them. At least that's all I could get it to do with any of my Fl

Testing it out, it seems to be a dialog that accepts .fla files and tells you it can't convert them. At least that's all I could get it to do with any of my Flash projects. Has anybody managed to find a subset of Flash that it will actually convert?

NetMonkey 16y ago
It worked pretty well with an animation from an old project: Html5: http://enwire.dk/Wallaby/Html5/ http://enwire.dk/Wallaby/Html5/ Flash: http://enwire.dk/Wallaby/Flash/ http://enwire.dk/Wallaby/Flash/ At least it works in Chrome but it looks kinda funny in IE9. For basic animations it could probably be useful.
- nailer 16y ago
  Looking at it in Chrome (no love in FF3, but I suspect FF4 willchnage that) I'm actually impressed. That's a reasonable 1.0 effort.
  - andybak 16y ago
    FF4 isn't slated to support CSS animations AFAIK
- joakin 16y ago
  Having some Chrome about:flags turned on this hanged my machine... Lesson learned!
- 83457 16y ago
  Actually looks better to me in chrome/html5 than flash.
prr 16y ago
I managed to get one of my designers' fla animations to compile... ...into a very static (non animated) page. Apparently it doesn't do dynamic masks, which pretty much rules out any Flash design project I have ever worked on since about 2001. Also, how is this better than http://smokescreen.us/ http://smokescreen.us/?
- mortenjorck 16y ago
  Also, how is this better than http://smokescreen.us/ http://smokescreen.us/? I'd say its current advantage is that it exists.
  - jai 16y ago
    I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. smokescreen "exists" too - http://smokescreen.us/demos/js/smokescreen.0.1.3-min.js http://smokescreen.us/demos/js/smokescreen.0.1.3-min.js
    - mortenjorck 16y ago
      Is it possible to do anything with that apart from run the existing Smokescreen demos? There's nothing on the site that refers to anything having shipped or even a target ship date.

NetMonkey 16y ago

It worked pretty well with an animation from an old project: Html5: http://enwire.dk/Wallaby/Html5/ http://enwire.dk/Wallaby/Html5/ Flash: http://enwire.dk/Wallaby/Flash/ http://enwire.dk/Wallaby/Flash/ At least it works in Chrome but it looks kinda funny in IE9. For basic animations it could probably be useful.

nailer 16y ago
Looking at it in Chrome (no love in FF3, but I suspect FF4 willchnage that) I'm actually impressed. That's a reasonable 1.0 effort.
- andybak 16y ago
  FF4 isn't slated to support CSS animations AFAIK
joakin 16y ago
Having some Chrome about:flags turned on this hanged my machine... Lesson learned!
83457 16y ago
Actually looks better to me in chrome/html5 than flash.

prr 16y ago

I managed to get one of my designers' fla animations to compile... ...into a very static (non animated) page. Apparently it doesn't do dynamic masks, which pretty much rules out any Flash design project I have ever worked on since about 2001. Also, how is this better than http://smokescreen.us/ http://smokescreen.us/?

mortenjorck 16y ago
Also, how is this better than http://smokescreen.us/ http://smokescreen.us/? I'd say its current advantage is that it exists.
- jai 16y ago
  I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. smokescreen "exists" too - http://smokescreen.us/demos/js/smokescreen.0.1.3-min.js http://smokescreen.us/demos/js/smokescreen.0.1.3-min.js
  - mortenjorck 16y ago
    Is it possible to do anything with that apart from run the existing Smokescreen demos? There's nothing on the site that refers to anything having shipped or even a target ship date.