3 ms·
And? That was the point. It's better than 40% of the population becoming infected at the same time AND the hospitals totally collapsing.
by gdilla 6y ago
And? That was the point. It's better than 40% of the population becoming infected at the same time AND the hospitals totally collapsing.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- rootusrootus 6y agoI'm sorry you misunderstood. ~20% was my upper bound, ~0 the lower bound, and my opinion that we should find a middle ground.
- throwaway1777 6y ago20 isn't actually the upper bound though