4 ms·
This is not a rehash of previous topics, but is mathematically flawed. I commented on the blog itself since there were more comments there than here.
by akd 18y ago
This is not a rehash of previous topics, but is mathematically flawed. I commented on the blog itself since there were more comments there than here.
- ilamont 18y agoI read the comment, which was good. I only wish Anderson himself was more clear about his attitude toward the HBR piece -- he calls it "rock solid" and says that he's sure the analysis is accurate, and then proceeds to say that the author's use of percentages is misleading and he disagrees with the conclusions.
- nickb 18y agoAnderson collaborated with Prof. Elberse and she consulted on the book and came short endorsing it (strange, don't you think?) so Anderson didn't come out with any hard-hiting arguments against her well-researched piece. Incidentally, Lee Gomes of WSJ pretty much nailed it two years ago: http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB115387606762117314.html http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB115387606762117314.ht... Also, Lee told me that he wrote a new article on this and it will be published this Wed in WSJ. We'll see what he's come up with.