Location is not the really interesting thing - the social graph is. Location is interesting because it reveals the social graph, not the other way around. > I

Location is not the really interesting thing - the social graph is. Location is interesting because it reveals the social graph, not the other way around. > In fact there is no data at all leaving the phone until you get ill. Source? Everything I found that could be interpreted as a statement in that direction sounded like it was part of a description of the Apple-Google approach. In particular, I wonder if the APIs exposed to non-system apps let them rotate the Bluetooth identifiers, of if this will cause the phones to beacon their non-randomized Bluetooth equivalent of a MAC address nonstop. (The Apple-Google proposal covered this by randomizing that address too.)