3 ms·

I would argue that those buttons train consumers for worse in the future. Next time it will be a button that says we retain access to your mind while you are us

I would argue that those buttons train consumers for worse in the future. Next time it will be a button that says we retain access to your mind while you are using this service and all the consumers will just agree like they did before. It's as flawed as false sense of security or all tos are legally enforceable click check mark buttons. They aren't. Stop trying to pretend they are and cause a chilling effect in people. It's social_manipulation! So yeah I absolutely hate that banner. it's terrible.

simion314 7y ago
>Next time it will be a button that says we retain access to your mind while you are using this service and all the consumers will just agree like they did before. This is not true for all users, some users will always click on the big blue button and the problem is not GRPR but shit designers, like PayPal is pushing me into some new thing with a page with a giant blue button and a super small "No now" link, shit companies will always be shit , they will always screw you but this time GRPR forces them to be transparent on how bad are they screwing you. The popups are annying but you know what, some users are deciding to click NO, and go to a different web page. So if news website A has annoying popups and shit design with tons of ads users will find eventually the website with less ads and popups or will install an extension that block all the tracking and ads. So if the GDPR popup will convince some people to install ad blocking to block the popup and the tracking then is great. Power users like myself are running with JS off and white-listing good websites to allow JS. If some link shared here is not opening then I just read something else.