Reading the tweet thread linked under "personal attacks and general disparaging comments" (https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1253822258692284416 https://t

Reading the tweet thread linked under "personal attacks and general disparaging comments" (https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1253822258692284416 https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1253822258692284416), I see much more a criticism of poor science journalism in the WSJ than the poor science in the article itself (aside from one swipe as a "methodological piece of shit"). I'm all for rigorous debate of different scientific ideas, but the WSJ Opinion page is not where people should be marshaling allies to their scientific ideas that are regarded as tenuous by the majority of the community.