4 ms·
> Laws exist with the consent of the governed. This is goalpost moving. Of course laws exist by the consent of the governed. Your original post claimed that th
by the_watcher 6y ago
> Laws exist with the consent of the governed.
This is goalpost moving. Of course laws exist by the consent of the governed. Your original post claimed that there was no law, and that businesses should consider litigating to the Supreme Court, relying on pro bono lawyers who "remember their Constitution", despite the complete lack of Constitutional support for your argument.
- walterbell 6y agoNo law for house arrest. The "consent of the governed" comment was about state emergency powers. There's no specific argument to litigate until a specific business opens and gets into a legal dispute with a specific state.