3 ms·
Yes. Except mobx ;) I like to use function components together with class based observable view models. Only a single hook wires them up. Works like a charm and
by Gehinnn 6y ago
Yes. Except mobx ;)
I like to use function components together with class based observable view models. Only a single hook wires them up. Works like a charm and avoids all the IMHO confusing hook complexity.
- desc 6y agoHmm, so the reusable bit is the straightforward inject-everything component, driven by an app-specific, app-aware hook-using part? I can see how that can work for simple cases. Nesting components is going to get tricky though if the classes don't operate exactly the way the hooks expect. Of course that's the problem: someone built hooks for their trivial cases and now they're the 'preferred' approach... Edit: To clarify, 'simple' is going to be context-dependent since hook behaviour is. If your 'driving skeleton' of hook-based components is in the direct uninterrupted ancestry chain of every class component, you're probably using hooks in a near-ideal case.
- Gehinnn 6y agoThis is how we use it: https://imgur.com/a/I6BD4vF https://imgur.com/a/I6BD4vF To be honest, we abstracted hooks away. It works for arbitrary complex cases.