3 ms·
This is the weirdest article I’ve read in a long time. Essentially zero content, 90% of the article isn’t about what they are actually suggesting. It’s written
by nil-sec 6y ago
This is the weirdest article I’ve read in a long time. Essentially zero content, 90% of the article isn’t about what they are actually suggesting. It’s written to convince me that these are very fine people who even sold their stocks before advising the government! Wow! The poor guys read 10 Papers per day, they couldn’t even shower. And after all this work, they suggest an app and better testing! Ah, and Remdesivir. Good that they thought of that, wouldn’t know what to do otherwise I guess. Is this paid advertisement or what’s the deal?
- dang 6y agoPlease don't snark here. Maybe you don't owe secret-yet-featured-in-WSJ billionaires-and-scientists any better, but you owe this community better if you're posting to it. Our intention is to avoid the systemic effects of snark, and to be at least marginally more interesting than internet default. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html