3 ms·
There's a difference between being able to eat meat, and requiring meat. Sure we can eat it and we won't die, but we'll certainly be losing years off our life.
by geddy 6y ago
There's a difference between being able to eat meat, and requiring meat. Sure we can eat it and we won't die, but we'll certainly be losing years off our life.
The science doesn't lie - you can thrive for a lifetime on only plants, but you won't get far on a lifetime of only meat.
- dalore 6y agoEverything you said is true, except the other way. Meat is way we thrived and evolved on. Plants was for survival only. You're right the science doesn't lie. There is no science that shows a lifetime of meat doesn't get you far (there are some that show you excel though). There are questionable questionnaire studies that show association with processed food (and for some reason they put meat in this, further confounding it) has a very small increase correlation with risk of cancer. Meanwhile all those athletes "thriving" on plans actually saw their performance drop.