4 ms·
That was my interpretation as well. I feel like this is another case of someone new to the industry creating a “standard” for something that, had they been arou
by chrismeller 7y ago
That was my interpretation as well. I feel like this is another case of someone new to the industry creating a “standard” for something that, had they been around for a few decades, they would have realized already existed in a different context.
Case in point: we have had “external” uni- and omni-directional antennas, even for plain old 802.11, for decades.
- Sharlin 7y agoIsn't this exactly reusing old technology that has existed for decades (well, over a century now) in a slightly different context? I mean, a lot of pre-existing coax is there exactly for the purpose of running a signal between an antenna and a device…
- chrismeller 7y agoOf course. But would you call that “WiFi over coax”? No one I knows would...