I do think majority of the effort should be spent on protection from hacking, but dismissing other very real attack vector as entirely hypothetical is just naiv

I do think majority of the effort should be spent on protection from hacking, but dismissing other very real attack vector as entirely hypothetical is just naive. Last elections were decided by 80k votes, in a country with 250M eligible voters. With such a tight margins we have a lot of valid attack vectors, not only most obvious hacking ones. Effective organizations are (and should be) able to deal with many risks at once. Do you think that during Cuban missiles crisis all other investigations stopped, and 100% of CIA, FBI, Police, Army etc focused on Cuba?