3 ms·
Probably, but there may be some important difference I'm missing. I did the study quite a while ago, and it was around the time I did another study involving '
by 01100011 7y ago
Probably, but there may be some important difference I'm missing. I did the study quite a while ago, and it was around the time I did another study involving 'programmable' lenses where the prescription was set using a process "similar to how writable DVDs are made", or so they explained it at the time. Those lenses were shit, IIRC.
I really miss those wavefront lenses. I kept them for years before dropping them on a hike. I'd gladly pay extra for them again.
I remember the machine which mapped my eyes only took a minute or less to take my prescription. Nothing like a phoropter, which I feel is subjective and error prone. They also used a camera system to fit the lenses, similar to what LensCrafters used when I got a pair of Rx sunglasses a month or so ago.
- jakeogh 7y agoTake a look at the iProfilerPlus, it's description is an 'ocular wavefront aberrometer', by Zeiss. I believe https://clearviewvisioncare.com https://clearviewvisioncare.com (in Tucson) has one, they are open (I know cuz they called me last week), I bet they can answer your questions. https://www.zeiss.com/vision-care/us/for-eye-care-professionals/products/zeiss-instruments-and-systems/i-profiler.html https://www.zeiss.com/vision-care/us/for-eye-care-profession... https://www.zeiss.com/vision-care/us/search/find-an-eye-doctor-near-you.html https://www.zeiss.com/vision-care/us/search/find-an-eye-doct...