5 ms·
The New York Times (via Reuters) covered it correctly. https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/04/25/world/americas/25reuters-health-coronavirus-who.html https://w
by lern_too_spel 7y ago
The New York Times (via Reuters) covered it correctly. https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/04/25/world/americas/25reuters-health-coronavirus-who.html https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/04/25/world/americas/25...
The Washington Post also covered it correctly: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/04/25/coronavirus-latest-news/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/04/25/coronavirus-...
All three of your articles also reported it correctly.
Even the Bloomberg article was correct except for a single word ("finding"). This looks like a tempest in a teapot to me.
- aaron695 7y agoThose two headlines are not reported correctly. I don't know if you are being obtuse or don't understand the issue. We have know since last century Coronavirus's can reinfect you. Since January we have discussed how long C19 might give immunity. So for WHO/media to put out a headline like they have they must have collated or found new information that breaks us from our current beliefs. They have not.
- lern_too_spel 7y agoThe two headlines are exactly what the WHO said, so of course they are reported correctly. > So for WHO/media to put out a headline like they have they must have collated or found new information that breaks us from our current beliefs. The statement comes in the context of member states implementing immunity passport programs, not in the context of having new information, which is neither stated nor implied.