8 ms·
It seems that a simpler attribution chain, and one mentioned in the article, is simply that Apple said no.
by peteretep 7y ago
It seems that a simpler attribution chain, and one mentioned in the article, is simply that Apple said no.
- derda 7y agoThing is in the previous discussion it was already mentioned by experts that this "No" would be likely and that the result would be an App that would not be tightly integrated with the OS and thus less useful (and less used). But its now really easy for the politicians to point the finger at Apple instead of admitting ones fault. How large the influence of the CCC actually has been is of course uncertain but their comments have played a big part in public discussion of the last days. Most articles that I have read mentioned the criticism. And in German media quoting the CCC is often synonymous with "the nerds who actually understand computer say" (in good but also bad ways).
- exhilaration 7y agoCan you explain what Apple said no to? The article doesn't spell it out.
- peteretep 7y agoApple said no to allowing apps to do Bluetooth handshakes when they’re not open, as I understand it.