3 ms·
Personally, I think we're going to look back at this very differently than how it looks right now. If the studies showing the number of people that had it and b
by SlowRobotAhead 6y ago
Personally, I think we're going to look back at this very differently than how it looks right now. If the studies showing the number of people that had it and built immunity without ever showing symptoms are correct, well, it'll be interesting to see what happens next time this comes up.
But, that's the larger point I think... Next time.
Let's say this ends up being way better than anyone modeled, it's great practice for a virus that actually has a 5%, or 10%, or etc fatality rate.
- doubleunplussed 6y ago> If the studies showing the number of people that had it and built immunity without ever showing symptoms are correct They're not. The NY study is the only one measuring a positive rate much higher than the false positive rates of the tests, and it is consistent with about a 1% infection fatality rate.