I can tell the design is ad-hoc. There is a science to manual writing, the author appears to be unaware of it (I guess by virtue of being born into an English s

I can tell the design is ad-hoc. There is a science to manual writing, the author appears to be unaware of it (I guess by virtue of being born into an English speaking nation which afaict never saw fit to follow other ones who had already developed relevant standards in the 1960s). I see a couple improvements so that the proposal falls more in line with those standards: 1 should have an upstroke. 0 should have a loop, dot or stroke, not O. q descender should have a stroke, not a loop. 9 should have a round bottom. g descender should have a loop. Latin letters should be written in script form, not block letter form, notably: ℰ, 𝒢, ℐ, 𝒥, ℒ, 𝒴, not E, G, I, J, L, Y.