3 ms·
The reason it isn't already a thing is because it would require a law on the books across all scales for business records with compliance costs - down to Billy
by Nasrudith 7y ago
The reason it isn't already a thing is because it would require a law on the books across all scales for business records with compliance costs - down to Billy Bob's Billboards where he takes cash for ad postings. The legal system is still based on assumptions of the government not having default access to all financial transactions as not only would it have been just useless abusable spam but it would have generated massive expenses for little gain and drawn considerable ire. Plus said proposal would trigger every Revelations literalist about "the number of the Beast" as well as privacy advocates and businessess upset at increased compliance costs and liability. Until the Fake News rise approaching moral panic absolutely nobody would be for it.
Hell if they were to try to codify such requirements it may not even survive the supreme court.
- perl4ever 7y agobut...waving hands vaguely, what about banks and "know your customer"? If it's possible to regulate them, why not Google? Not making an airtight detailed argument, but I feel like you must be misguided because your tone suggests that a massive societal upheaval is necessary for the sort of controls we already take for granted in certain areas.